United Spinal Association of Georgia is part of United Spinal Association’s National Advocacy Network. We participate annually on the Roll on Capital Hill in Washington, DC in addition to advocating for the rights of people with disabilities right here in Georgia.
United Spinal Association of Georgia (USAGA) is adding its voice to the organizations across the state calling for full Medicaid expansion. For Georgians living with spinal cord injuries and other mobility disabilities, health coverage is about more than doctor visits.
It determines whether a person can get a working wheelchair, the supplies they use every day, and the personal care that lets them live independently.
The short version: Georgia already spends real money on healthcare access and gets a worse return than full expansion would deliver. The question is no longer whether to spend. It is whether to spend well.
Georgia has the third-highest share of uninsured residents in the nation. About 240,000 low-income Georgians fall into the “coverage gap”: they earn too much to qualify for the state’s traditional Medicaid program but too little to receive subsidies on the ACA marketplace.
Full Medicaid expansion would extend coverage to an estimated 470,000 or more Georgians, including about 155,000 uninsured women and about 32,000 uninsured veterans and military spouses.
Many people with spinal cord injuries rely on Medicare, which typically covers about 80% of the cost of durable medical equipment and supplies. The remaining 20% coinsurance for a wheelchair, catheters, or other essential supplies can quickly become unaffordable. For many people, Medicaid is what fills that gap.
Georgia also sets notably strict income limits for the Medicaid pathways available to people with disabilities. As a result, many Georgians with serious disabilities and limited incomes still go without the coverage they need for equipment, supplies, and personal care services.

Billions in Federal Funds Left on the Table
Georgia forgoes roughly $3 billion in federal funding each year, more than $8 million a day, and over $21 billion to date.

A Lower Federal Match
Full expansion draws a 90% federal match. Georgia’s current alternative, Pathways to Coverage, receives 67%.

Rural Hospitals Under Strain
Seven rural Georgia hospitals have closed since 2013, and more than half of those remaining operate in the red. In states that expanded Medicaid, hospitals’ uncompensated care costs fell by roughly 56% to 60%.

Coverage for 470,000 or more Georgians

An estimated 56,000 jobs created each year, including about 12,000 in rural communities

A $6.5 billion annual boost to state economic output, including $1.3 billion in rural areas

Greater taxpayer value: Full expansion is more cost-effective than Pathways over its first two years, leveraging higher federal matches and new revenue.
Georgia launched Pathways to Coverage in mid-2023 as a limited alternative to full expansion. The results so far make a strong case for a more efficient approach:
Whatever path Georgia chooses, it should be one that reaches the people it is meant to serve and draws the highest available federal match.
Georgia faces a Medicaid decision in the coming months, not years:
Georgia’s next governor and General Assembly will face these decisions soon after taking office. Closing the coverage gap will take support from lawmakers across the political spectrum, and we believe the case for expansion is one that people of every party can support: it improves access to care, strengthens rural hospitals, and makes better use of Georgia taxpayers’ dollars.
USAGA joins a broad community of Georgia organizations already working to close the coverage gap, including the Cover Georgia Coalition convened by Georgians for a Healthy Future, the Georgia Budget and Policy Institute, and disability- and disease-specific groups such as the Spina Bifida Association, the Arthritis Foundation, and the Lupus Foundation.
We bring a distinct perspective to that effort: the experiences of Georgians living with spinal cord injuries and mobility disabilities, whose independence depends on consistent, affordable coverage.